BMW News, F97, F98, X3 M, X4 M

X3M X4M gets iDrive 7 starting April


From Bimmertoday (German)

Translation:

Last autumn, the iDrive system in BMW X3 G01 and X4 G02 was brought to the current OS 7.0 without much ado, and now the M models F97 and F98 are following: From April 2020, the power SUV BMW X3 M and X4 M a major infotainment update. As with the 5 Series, the facelift is not waited for, instead the changeover is carried out without any noticeable changes as a model maintenance measure with the new model year.

In addition to the new iDrive technology on the infotainment display, the change to OS 7.0 also means a new look for the instrument display. We can already guess what the display behind the steering wheel will look like from the example of the big brothers X5 M and X6 M. Our little graphic gimmick already shows the displays there with the logo of the BMW X3 M, because apart from the model designation, the X3 M and X4 M are likely to continue to use the digital speedometers of the big brothers. It remains to be seen whether the two power SUVs will also receive the new M setup logic that was introduced with the M8.

The objectively more important changes, however, take place on the central infotainment display, where the BMW Live Cockpit ConnectedDrive ensures that the tile design of the previously installed system is abandoned. Also completely new is the voice control, which can be activated with the push of a button using “Hey BMW”. The activation word BMW can also be replaced by any other word if the driver would like to address the digital assistant with a different name.

Various pads with live content can be placed relatively freely on the large infotainment display, so that each customer can adapt the system to their own preferences. Just like before, all functions can be controlled both by iDrive controller and by touching the touch screen. Gesture control is also available for some other functions, which works with simple hand movements in the area in front of the display.





Source link

BMW News, F98, Reviews, Videos, X4 M

Video: X4M Competition Driving Impressions


Quote:



Originally Posted by Imran@Evolve

Video: X4M Competition Driving Impressions -Got my hands on a X4M Competition … Check out the video review …


Thanks for sharing, Imran – well done.

For us, this line (especially the larger cargo-area X3M) is the perfect blend of utility, performance, handling and luxury at a reasonable price point considering all that it offers. Yesterday I carried 800 lbs of river rock and some additional landscaping supplies, while today I get to enjoy it’s handling on some country roads. Really glad M Division is offering them now.





Source link

BMW News, F97, F98, Videos, VS., X3 M, X4 M

Drag Race – X3M Competition vs F-Pace SVR


Quote:



Originally Posted by e90335e36m3

Love the “if the X3M used launch control” replies. Convenient that when the result isn’t quite what we expected we are quick to blame some aspect of the set up, like track set up or use of LC. LC is always controversial with many saying it’s complete garbage. If they had used it and the outcome was exactly the same people would be blaming the LC.

As much bc as we want the X3M to annihilate every competitor, it didn’t, let’s just live with it for what it is.


Considering Jag has 550 hp and 502 torque, with a similar weight to X3M (within 50 lbs I think), it should have won…

Car and Driver breaks it down here, the numbers don’t lie, compared to the X3M it makes perfect sense. 0-60 was 4.1 (X3M would have been 3.3 with LC and destroyed it off the line), BUT the rolling start is 4.4 and they tested the X3MC at 4.6 which explains why the SVR won off the line (LC was not used) but the X3MC still catches up in the full 1/4 mile. many have tested the X3MC at under 12 seconds when using LC (including magazines), while the article below shows SVR best time at 12.4.

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews…r-first-drive/





Source link

BMW News, F98, X4 M

C/D: X4 M Competition Instrument Testing


2020 BMW X4 M Competition Is One of the Quickest SUVs We’ve Tested

It may ride firmly and look funky, but BMW’s fast-roof compact performance SUV is seriously capable on the road.

Much about the 2020 BMW X4 M Competition’s casual disdain for Newton’s various laws of motion impresses us, but it this crossover’s acceleration figures that truly encapsulate its ludicrous capabilities. While its hunchbacked styling and squat stance are more hatchback than crossover, the range-topping X4 still is one of the quickest SUVs we have ever tested. Indeed, it’s also one of the quickest M cars.

HIGHS: Hugely powerful turbo inline-six, impressive acceleration, massive grip.

A 3.3-second zero-to-60-mph time is impressive in anything, let alone a 4539-pound crossover that clearly has been styled to impress. In posting that time, the X4 M Competition falls but a tenth shy of the figures we recorded for both the Mercedes-AMG GLC63 S coupe and the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio, yet the BMW’s 8.0-second pull to 100 mph is quicker than both. While the Lamborghini Urus still posts the quickest straight-line test results of any SUV we’ve sampled, the $81,395 X4 M Competition costs less than half its price.

A Compact SUV Rocket
This Bimmer’s motivation comes from a new twin-turbocharged 3.0-liter inline-six, codenamed S58, which also will find its way into the next-generation M3 and M4 models. It is the most powerful road-going six-cylinder engine that BMW has ever made and will happily snarl all the way to its 7200-rpm redline. While the S58 in the non-Competition X4 M employs 17.4 psi of boost to generate 473 horsepower, the Competition’s compressors huff 18.9 psi into the engine for a heady output of 503 horses. The huge output reaches the road through an eight-speed automatic transmission and an all-wheel-drive system that incorporates the same electronically controlled torque-biasing rear differential that is fitted to the BMW M5 super sedan.

LOWS: Firm ride, more expensive and less practical than the X3 M, inelegant hunchback design.

Despite the muscularity of its hardware, the abiding impression of the X4 M on the road is how usable it feels. The engine is happy to burble along at low speeds, with the automatic gearbox shifting intelligently to disguise the fact that there is some noticeable turbo lag below 3000 rpm, which you really only can detect when using the manual-shifting paddles on the back of the steering wheel. This BMW rides on steel coil springs rather than air springs, and although these are on the firm side of comfortable, standard adaptive dampers keep the ride relatively pliant over broken Michigan blacktop. Some drivers felt that the dampers’ firmer Sport and Sport Plus settings were too unyielding for use away from a glass-smooth racetrack, yet others seemed to tolerate the X4 M’s occasional buckboard impact harshness with little grumbling.

So Many Settings
This being a modern BMW M car, there are a multitude of dynamic chassis and powertrain settings that drivers can tweak to their heart’s content in an almost-endless pursuit of the optimal setup. The X4 M also gets the same slightly confusing sideways-orientated gear selector as the M5 and M6, with which you slide right to go from Neutral to Drive or left and up to engage Reverse. The lever incorporates a small toggle to select three different gearshift programs of increasing severity. There also are separate buttons for adjusting the engine’s aggressiveness, the suspension’s stiffness, and the electrically assisted steering’s weight through three modes, plus another button for the stability control’s settings (on, Sport, and fully deactivated) and yet another for opening the flaps in the active exhaust system. What’s more, the X4 M’s xDrive all-wheel-drive system can be put into a more rear-biased AWD Sport mode but only with the stability control switched off. Small wonder there are two red M toggles on the steering wheel that can activate separate, driver-selected profiles for all of the available settings.

Our experience with the X4 M suggested that most drivers will quickly cut through the myriad of choices. We found little reason not to stick with the steering’s softest Comfort setting, which allows some natural feedback to reach the rim without the artificial weight added by Sport and Sport Plus modes. Similarly, we can’t see much use for the powertrain’s Efficient setting in a 500-hp SUV, which seems to do little but kill the turbo-six’s throttle response. The all-wheel-drive system works by sending as much torque as it can to the rear axle and diverting it forward only when slip is detected. The Sport and Sport Plus drive modes both raise the intervention threshold for slippage and make the car feel more edgy and exciting without becoming wayward. (Unlike the M5 and M6, there is no rear-drive-only mode.)

Grip levels are massive, the X4 M generating a sticky 0.97 g of lateral acceleration around the skidpad on its 21-inch Michelin Pilot Sport 4S tires; the GLC63 S managed 0.94 g, and the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quad topped out at 0.95 g. On the road the X4 M shows impressive agility considering its considerable mass. Yet, while it turns keenly and accurately we noticed that the steering feels overly springy if you release the wheel with lock applied. Braking is handled by 15.6-inch rotors with four-piston calipers at the front and 14.6-inch rotors with single pistons at the rear, which are savagely effective, bringing the BMW to a stop from 70 mph in just 147 feet.

Capable but Compromised
Like the regular X4, the M is one of those crossovers where design is more important than raw practicality. It is a lifestyle statement. The rear seat is cramped for adult occupants, who will suffer a shortage of both knee and headroom and also will have to endure the upright angle of the seatback. The mechanically identical BMW X3 M is considerably more spacious inside, as well as handsomer (if less visually striking) on the outside.

In addition to the Competition model’s increased power output, it also brings a standard sport exhaust system, larger anti-roll bars, and 21-inch wheels, plus the all-important Competition badge that sits beneath the X4 M emblem on the rear hatch. Whether all this justifies the $7000 premium that BMW charges for the Competition over the regular X4 M is a fair question, but for the car’s target market, such considerations are unlikely to matter too much. If you want the quickest SUV under $100K, this is the current champion

Testing Data
VEHICLE TYPE
front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door hatchback

PRICE AS TESTED
$86,495 (base price: $81,395)

ENGINE TYPE
twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve inline-6, aluminum block and head, direct fuel injection
Displacement
183 cu in, 2993 cc
Power
503 hp @ 7300 rpm
Torque
442 lb-ft @ 2600 rpm

TRANSMISSION
8-speed automatic

CHASSIS
Suspension (F/R): strut/multilink
Brakes (F/R): 15.6-in vented, cross-drilled disc/14.6-in vented, cross-drilled disc
Tires: Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, F: 255/40R-21 (103Y) ★ R: 265/40R-21 (105Y) ★

DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 112.8 in
Length: 187.5 in
Width: 75.9 in
Height: 63.8 in
Passenger volume: 96 cu ft
Cargo volume: 19 cu ft
Curb weight: 4539 lb

C/D TEST RESULTS
Rollout, 1 ft: 0.2 sec
60 mph: 3.3 sec
100 mph: 8.0 sec
150 mph: 21.5 sec
Rolling start, 5–60 mph: 4.6 sec
Top gear, 30–50 mph: 2.7 sec
Top gear, 50–70 mph: 3.1 sec
¼-mile: 11.6 sec @ 119 mph
Top speed (governor limited, mfr’s claim): 161 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 147 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.97 g

C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 15 mpg
75-mph highway driving: 26 mpg
Highway range: 440 miles

EPA FUEL ECONOMY
Combined/city/highway: 16/14/19 mpg





Source link

BMW News, F97, F98, Tuned, X3 M, X4 M

RaceChip on F97/F98 X3M/X4M News.


Quote:



Originally Posted by cfm56d7b

How would the engine handle additional stress? Every engine has an operating envelope and S58 is no exception.


They are Germans. They know their stuff.
They won’t push it to the max limit without thorough R&D.
This is only a beginning. Some others will claim more gain without knowing the details, just all about profit.

Quote:



Originally Posted by BMWZ4
View Post

My thoughts exactly. Geez…600+hp?…500 not enough lol?


Of course not. American getting bigger and fatter. 600hp will be better than 500hp.

Quote:



Originally Posted by onfireX5
View Post

No worries on the driveline as it’s mostly M5 parts and very overbuilt. S58 is totally forged so as long as your octane matches the tune, no issues there with a “moderate” boost increase.

As fast as these things are stock, I’m betting their X4M Standard Non Comp measured 540-550 engine hp stock. Then they added a safe 60ish.

This will make an awesome ride…….uhhhhh….awesomerrrrrrr


Can’t wait on mine too.

Do you want to ship your RaceChip GTS Black over to me first and get it reprogrammed right away when it is ready?





Source link

PreviousNext

You Want To Have Your Favorite Car?

We have a big list of modern & classic cars in both used and new categories.